He or she might not necessarily be visiting frequently here.RishiRahul wrote:I understand all this, Dada.
But still do not understand what horochat wanted to know.
Only he can explain this.
Or maybe, he gave up!
Rishi
![:-)](./images/smilies/001.gif)
Moderators: eye_of_tiger, shalimar123, RishiRahul
Horochat!RishiRahul wrote:Are we talking of Dasa chhidra here?Rohiniranjan wrote:He or she might not necessarily be visiting frequently here.RishiRahul wrote:I understand all this, Dada.
But still do not understand what horochat wanted to know.
Only he can explain this.
Or maybe, he gave up!
Rishi
Rishi
Rohiniranjan wrote:Horochat!RishiRahul wrote:Are we talking of Dasa chhidra here?Rohiniranjan wrote:He or she might not necessarily be visiting frequently here.RishiRahul wrote:I understand all this, Dada.
But still do not understand what horochat wanted to know.
Only he can explain this.
Or maybe, he gave up!
Rishi
Rishi
Yes I think, and also in both partners, so both are experiencing venus dasa at the same time or in a partly overlapped manner. The flaw in that is that venus may mean two entirely different domain for each and only the same in sthira and naisargica karakshipRishiRahul wrote:Rohiniranjan wrote:Horochat!RishiRahul wrote:Are we talking of Dasa chhidra here?Rohiniranjan wrote:He or she might not necessarily be visiting frequently here.RishiRahul wrote:I understand all this, Dada.
But still do not understand what horochat wanted to know.
Only he can explain this.
Or maybe, he gave up!
Rishi
Rishi
Was horochat talking of dasa chhidra as dasa sandhi?
Rishi
Sorry that was a bit cryptic. Please write a longer message to elaborate, Rishi. Which of the things would represent the environmental effect? Chara Karakatwa, different lordship domains...?? And why do you think so??? I may have a follow-up question but I will wait to hear from you.RishiRahul wrote:So this would show that they both are in for a different environment, and the change would be harsher than usual if married at that time.
I do not think it confirms a good or bad marriage; but a marriage taking place in changing circumstances they might not be expecting.
Rishi
Rishi ji,Was horochat talking of dasa chhidra as dasa sandhi?
Rishi
Rohiniranjan wrote:Sorry that was a bit cryptic. Please write a longer message to elaborate, Rishi. Which of the things would represent the environmental effect? Chara Karakatwa, different lordship domains...?? And why do you think so??? I may have a follow-up question but I will wait to hear from you.RishiRahul wrote:So this would show that they both are in for a different environment, and the change would be harsher than usual if married at that time.
I do not think it confirms a good or bad marriage; but a marriage taking place in changing circumstances they might not be expecting.
Rishi
Love and Light,
Rohiniranjan
mysbcrs wrote:Rishi ji,Was horochat talking of dasa chhidra as dasa sandhi?
Rishi
I also remember reading (am no good in specifics) another type of Sandhi used although I am not sure whether it is relevant only for chart matching or all relationships.
This is to see whether start/end dates of dasha co-incide over the next couple of years. The MDs could be of any graha. For e.g., male may be running Ma MD and female Ve. If the end dates coincide it is not desirable.
Horochat probably is referring to this and by 30 years he/she means that such cocincidence should not occur over 30 years.
How closely the dates should agree is another contentious matter (1 hour/1 day/ 1 month ...)?
Rishi,RishiRahul wrote:mysbcrs wrote:Rishi ji,Was horochat talking of dasa chhidra as dasa sandhi?
Rishi
I also remember reading (am no good in specifics) another type of Sandhi used although I am not sure whether it is relevant only for chart matching or all relationships.
This is to see whether start/end dates of dasha co-incide over the next couple of years. The MDs could be of any graha. For e.g., male may be running Ma MD and female Ve. If the end dates coincide it is not desirable.
Horochat probably is referring to this and by 30 years he/she means that such cocincidence should not occur over 30 years.
How closely the dates should agree is another contentious matter (1 hour/1 day/ 1 month ...)?
Hi,
After much time! Hope you are good.
If you have read the post written above , it could help.
The dates agreeing here does not matter for confirming results; only confirms indicative results/indications.
I hope I have understood you?
Rishi
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests