RishiRahul wrote:
...
Dada,
Politics is like Gin/Vodka amongst drinks, as it gets 'married to'/mixes with other so many things.
'Ekla cholo re' (to go alone) has also been the stance followed by me in my western and vedic astrology studies.
In palmistry I had and still have a partner for research.
Since I am not a very strongly technically bent person, I did not/rather was and still am impatient to go to a D charts construction technique; but just tested the ones available at Jhora, to find Kashinath hora more precise than the other.
Thus, still I am still open to trying out new better techniques in hora or other D charts.
Again my stance of 'Ekla Cholo re' was also motivated by seeing people lobbying with their choices, whatever reason it may be for; sometimes they themselves are not aware whose side one is in and what for!?).
Reading anecdotal evidence:= I never felt the need to keep this on record, maybe due to my impatience to prove a theory or just, impatience.
My quest was to attain better predictions through whatever method used.
Maybe sometimes as I go along Life, as I grow and mature I might feel the need to.
Rishi
In the kolaahal of company, often the faint refrains of the Universe (Higher Intelligence) become buried. The noise drowns the signal?
So, sometimes the Universe arranges things in such a manner which makes the noise go away or become much diminished and the signal becomes more clearly discerned. Sometimes the noise remains unabated but ones hearing changes or perhaps the wiring in the perceptive part of brain and the noise gets perceived as being distinct from the signal. One then acquires the freedom of choice of choosing either to follow the noise or follow the signal. Initially, or perhaps longer, one chooses to sample those alternately. This is what Thakur in his allegory of the goat tied with a rope in the courtyard is perhaps about.
As I wrote earlier, the goat sometimes begins to see the rope that limits it, as a barrier, an enemy and fights it, chews it, fumes and rants and pants, but forgets that it cannot change the courtyard, nor day-dream about ascension higher than the wall that defines the courtyard and sing "Born Free!!", but rather, the enables the goat to focus itself from being a participant to an observer and it studies the courtyard and all the things in it, their shapes, their relations with other objects, and realizes that its boundaries expand beyond where its four physical limbs can take it to.
This D2 might be a distraction in a sense. It is a shiny apple, tasty and delicious but tell me sincerely (or tell yourself), if Gods of Astrology were to remove all information about D2 from the universe at this instant, would astrologers or astrology minus D2 would really miss it all that much or become severely incapable of figuring out the things that D2 is meant to or claimed to tell us?
Just in the past several decades astrologers in hordes had been lumping all planets in either cancer or leo and still capable of brilliant and more importantly, predictions and advices given to clients who benefited from those. Does this not tell us something important about D2. There are those who are more into archeology and get excited when they find a piece of bone or another relic from an era long gone and then they begin to focus too much on that and begin to imagine about the skeleton that it once belonged. And, then, there are others who praise the work and dedication of these archeologists but must then attend to the living who are "here" and 'suffering'!
Different strokes?
Rohiniranjan
:smt005 
