What is NOT hilarious, but alarmingly becoming OBVIOUS is that many astrophils despite seeing the utter failure of ONE-FACTOR anecdotal impressions and essentially beliefs though logical sounding, would still continue to cling on to those ...!vijiyan wrote:RR Ji, Hilarious statement about the criminals. :smt003Rohiniranjan wrote: Leaving your relative aside, Vijiyan, I was quite intrigued by your emboldened statement!
Out of 9146 A/AA data, with R1 (lagnesh) in 5, 8, 9 or 12 houses (included 9th due to its spiritual relevance, well accepted by mainstream!):
384 criminals but only 262 charts of religious and spiritual folks.
Out of 4166 of charts with R1 in 5, 8, 9 or 12th + benefic fully aspecting R1 in these places:
158 criminals vs 123 Spiritual-religious folks!
Anecdotal statements and beliefs and pronouncements [aka, EXPECTED] must be tested against data [OBSERVED in significantly large samples] lest they GEL into misconceptions and without mincing words: MISINFORMATION!
HNY, the year has just begun! The trend hopefully, continues!
Rohiniranjan
Yes, true that must be tested. :)
It is a shame that despite much progress in brilliant programmers focusing so much on bringing out yet another calculation engine for single horoscopes (and I am not pooh-poohing their hard and focused work and brain-children) hardly any in the Jyotish IT field have even found such revealing and eye-opening tools for learning and research as tropical astrology platform has produced, like jigsaw for instance and even ADB which then incorporated Jyotish search engines but due to apathy of jyotishis and learners of jyotish did not find support. Jigsaw on the other hand I believe continues to be available. Maybe the tropical astrologers are more progressive than us and more critical about their learning and beliefs!
Maybe we simply do not wish to be rigorous and young or old like to continue our merry ways!
Of course, it is no skin off my nose...
Love and Light,
Rohiniranjan
