Hehe, looks like votive and i went a bit too deep for your and ChanDubai's comfort! Remarkable difference in reactions, though! <LOL>RishiRahul wrote:Rohiniranjan wrote:Votive wrote:If I may....as we talk on Arudha padas, can we also ponder on the situation that the Arudha lagna falls only in the houses 3,4,5 and 9, 10, 11.
Or atleast, this is my observation. Viewing it in the North Indian diamond chart, it seems to be sending a signal perhaps. The symmetry of bhavas both on the visible and the invisible half of the chart is rather intriguing.
Interestingly of the so called dusthana or the houses 6, 8 and 12...the AL cannot be there.
Similarly, amongst the Upachaya bhavas, minus the Sixth, there is a 50 % probability of AL falling in an upachaya bhava.
Again, if we take both the trikona and the kendras, there is a 66% probability of the AL being in one of the trikonas or the kendras.
The natural corollary is that in the remaining cases the AL is in the Upachayas. This happens too only when the Lagna lord posits in the second, eighth houses for the AL to be in the third house and when the Lagnesh settles in the sixth and the twelvfth that the AL is seen in the Laabh bhava. For the Lagna lord to be in the even houses...except the kendra bhavas of fourth and tenth, the AL is in the upachayas certainly.
In my opinion, AL in third or 8th from 8th brings the sixth from AL in focus , in this case, a loaded bhava . Should be a person to whom people gravitate towards naturally, certainly not a recluse. With strong communication channel capability!
votive
My dear Votive,
My first (knee-jerk tendency) was to write to you privately, but then decided to voice my feelings and thoughts publicly. I am not sure why but after reading your thoughts I felt very proud of you! I have been fairly upset, lately, at what I have been reading on Yahoo fora and have been wondering at times: Whither Jyotish...?
Your thoughts provided much *healing* because this is indeed how modern jyotish afficianados must apply their minds to Jyotish. Long ago when I was gradually absorbing astrology from whatever source available: ancient, quasi-ancient and contemporary, I found it remarkable and somewhat disturbing that jyotish still remains imprisoned in minds as a religious entity, where gospel even where questionable remains walled-in like Anarkali! I also was a bit flummoxed by the nearly-TOTAL absence of any examples or real charts in nearly ALL ancient and quasi-ancient literature on Jyotish. More lately, the war (verbal skirmish?) seems to have become focused on and between contemporary jyotish scholars and such wasteful agendas. All this pains me personally, even though I have never had any personal associations with any group or following etc.
Though some may hastily run away from what they think is khichdi, but really it is kheer! Ma used to make kheer at birthdays and always included in her recipe, meva (kernels of dry fruit and nuts). Some children that loved both ate the combo and enjoyed it, others more discriminatory, first skimmed off the meva and enjoyed those, then enjoyed the rest of the kheer. Which one enjoyed the paayesh more, is hard to tell because both groups had a contented smile on their happy faces when they were done!
I liked the way you approached the matter of padas and rightly identified that only six houses can ever have the privilege of hosting the padas (moorings) for the 12 houses in any chart.
In addition to the statistical probabilities you provided, the repeating order (2x) of the padas (for the 12 possible placements of the lord of a house) are interesting to note as well (2nd layer of consideration, with the identification of the padas being the first layer), The 2nd layer repeating pattern (harmonic?) closely following the first half and the 2nd half of the chart in a paired dance of cosmic order. A third layer would be the pairing of different houses with the same pada, as if in a group - namely:
Pada -- Layer 1
10 -- 1, 7
3 -- 2, 8
5 -- 3, 9
4 -- 4, 10
9 -- 5, 11
11 -- 6, 12
A subtle harmonic relationship would hint at a functional pairing between:
11-6,12 (11th house working in tandem with 6th and 12th houses which are connected through the pada linkages)
but 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 12 being devoid of such linkages (not part of the elite pada group a sort of trisomy endowed with a degree of freedom-of-choice perhaps? Somewhat unencumbured??).
Let us think about that...! For these houses may generally represent the points on which the nativity must work upon and build, for better *mansions* that are in future, even distant future...?
I hope what I am thinking inside is coming across clearly and in an error-free manner (if the interface is working fluidly!).
BPHS gives an order of expression (sudarshan chakra chapter) whereby the planet placed in a house is the highest in expression (the floating and visible meva in the kheer). In charts where a jyotish stellium (has looser orbs than the tropical-seasonal astrolgy tradition!) is placed becomes a key house in terms of phal-bhog in a lifetime. If the dispositor of the stellium happens to be the AL or even AK or Lagna lord (one or more of these) indeed has the potential to be a major driver in life. As in the case you focused upon!
Thanks, Love and Light!
Rohiniranjan
I am not understanding this.
Rishi
Votive wrote:Ranjanda,
Thankyou for your generous praise. If I may be allowed to question a bit more...
There is a visible and elegant harmony in the Arudha concept. If one looks at a trine of 1, 5, 9 , they complement each other to create a whole. If one looks at the other trines...12,1,2; 3,4,5 and so on...they flank and supplement to form an arrow or a wedge , maybe there are better descriptions around. The Arudha then a part of such trines and the bhavas not having the Arudhas too create a pattern.
So, why is the 12, 1, 2 a trine which is devoid of the pada?
More significantly, why are the 1 and 7 the leaders of such trines?
Why is the 4/10 axis more prominent for the Padas?
Is it some indication of our current duties in the present?
It is also worthwhile to note that if we notice the AL on the visible ( Sun/daylight/ Father/Path/ Duties/ Light ) part of the chart or the invisible ( Moon/night/Ma/Resources/Love) part.
AL in 3,4,5 bhavas ( Lagna Lord in 2,3,4,8,9,10) and AL in 9,10,11 bhavas ( Lagna Lord in 1,5,6,7,11,12) there is yet another beautiful and vivid symmetry. Depending on the sequencing of the chart, the person can come across as (or appear) to be focused either more on people or on the task, more emotional or more logical, the ida nadi more prominent or the pingla nadi. The continuum could either be benevolent or harsh, when we speak of "people" orientation it could imply a hermit or a Gandhi.
If, of course, as you pointed out, the AL is linked facilely to other key indicators, the flow is smoother, if not how do we try and work on it.
votive
Thereafter, I am not understanding this too!
Rishi
Rohiniranjan