Hmmm...!RishiRahul wrote:Thanks for the elaboration! The relatively lazy myself after all.Rohiniranjan wrote:If lagnesh is placed in lagna, arudha cannot be in 1st house and falls in the 10thRishiRahul wrote:The delivery was premature actuaaly.Rohiniranjan wrote:Haha, my dear brother! You seem to have suddenly *bumped* this old thread after 7 solar/calendar months!
Why such a hurry? I do not understand
Had it been a human child, there would be cause for concern, because it would constitute a rather 'premature delivery'!!
Love, Light, (some) Levity!
Rohiniranjan
I was writing another post on perceptions & Arudhas, and while doing so I remembered this post, opened it after search & replied to it first, thinking to search for more insights.
Thanks,
Rishi
if in 2nd, arudha in 3
if in 3rd, arudha in 5
If in 4th, arudha cannot be in 7th house, hence falls in 4th
if in 5th, arudha in 9
if in 6th, arudha in 11
if in 7th, arudha cannot be in 7th (from house) hence in 10th
if in 8th, arudha in 3rd
if in 9th, then arudha in 5th
if in 10th, arudha cannot be in 7, hence in 4th
if in 11th, arudha in 9
if in 12th, arudha in 11
Hence, we get arudhas in 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, and 11 only. Which is what Votive ji was sharing, months ago when the pregnant discussion began! :smt004
Rohiniranjan
I wonder what can we infer from this? as 1,2,6,7,8,12 is left out/not possible?!
Of course, as I am aware, the 1 is left out as Lagna & Arudha lagna cannot be same.
Rishi
Please review: BPHS (Sharma, Sagar) E1995; chap31, slokas 4, 5, page 422
After reviewing the slokas or translations thereof, and your observations and experience with padas in your practice, studies, etc., what would you infer about those houses...?
Rohiniranjan