WHY?

[Rohiniranjan]

WHY is planet earth missing from astrology?

OR IS IT...?

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

[RishiRahul]

WHY is planet earth missing from astrology?

OR IS IT...?

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

The planet Earth must have been taken as 'US' or 'I'.

Rishi

[Rohiniranjan]

WHY is planet earth missing from astrology?

OR IS IT...?

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

The planet Earth must have been taken as 'US' or 'I'.

Rishi

But, neither **US**, nor *I* are part of the alphabet or rather alpha-numeric of astrology, which are nascent and must not be confused with interpretations of the alphanumerics, of which there are so many, as we both must have run into, over the years...?

I sometimes wonder as to why in Devnagri which is a sacred script in which many sacred scriptures got written, the alphabet does not contain the All-encompassing letter that we pronounce as the pranav-mantra...!

aka, {Love and Light}!

Rohiniranjan

[RishiRahul]

WHY is planet earth missing from astrology?

OR IS IT...?

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

The planet Earth must have been taken as 'US' or 'I'.

Rishi

But, neither **US**, nor *I* are part of the alphabet or rather alpha-numeric of astrology, which are nascent and must not be confused with interpretations of the alphanumerics, of which there are so many, as we both must have run into, over the years...?

I sometimes wonder as to why in Devnagri which is a sacred script in which many sacred scriptures got written, the alphabet does not contain the All-encompassing letter that we pronounce as the pranav-mantra...!

aka, {Love and Light}!

Rohiniranjan

Okay. Okay. What I meant was that: I am in Earth  or   I am Earth...... and am seeing/observing the planets in my birthchart, which are away from the Earth.

Rishi

[Astroenthusiast]

Can I answer?

[RishiRahul]

Open to/for anyone.....

RishiRahul

[Rohiniranjan]

Open to/for anyone.....

RishiRahul

Excluding me, of course! Otherwise it might sound like a tongue-in-cheek question, since I asked...!

AE, and other silent ones! Perhaps you have the same question as well! Or better still, you might have the answer...!

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

[Rohiniranjan]

WHY is planet earth missing from astrology?

OR IS IT...?

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

The planet Earth must have been taken as 'US' or 'I'.

Rishi

But, neither **US**, nor *I* are part of the alphabet or rather alpha-numeric of astrology, which are nascent and must not be confused with interpretations of the alphanumerics, of which there are so many, as we both must have run into, over the years...?

I sometimes wonder as to why in Devnagri which is a sacred script in which many sacred scriptures got written, the alphabet does not contain the All-encompassing letter that we pronounce as the pranav-mantra...!

aka, {Love and Light}!

Rohiniranjan

Okay. Okay. What I meant was that: I am in Earth  or   I am Earth...... and am seeing/observing the planets in my birthchart, which are away from the Earth.

Rishi

Are they, Rishi?
Am I to understand that you do not believe in the microcosmos...?

Rohiniranjan

[mysbcrs]

WHY is planet earth missing from astrology?

OR IS IT...?

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

RR ji,

IMO lagna is Earth, or rather, a personal "instance" of Earth for the native.

[Astroenthusiast]

Sir, I too believe first house should be representative of earth.

[RishiRahul]

Open to/for anyone.....

RishiRahul

Excluding me, of course! Otherwise it might sound like a tongue-in-cheek question, since I asked...!

AE, and other silent ones! Perhaps you have the same question as well! Or better still, you might have the answer...!

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

Why exclude you, the author of the thread? And why at all?

Actually there should be  more than 1 angle to 'why earth is missing in astrology, I guess.:
First one is astrological; the other being philosophical maybe.



Rishi

[RishiRahul]

Are they, Rishi?
Am I to understand that you do not believe in the microcosmos...?

Rohiniranjan

Dada,

I would certainly like to know more about this. Let me learn more & will share whatever I can

RishiRahul

[Rohiniranjan]

Open to/for anyone.....

RishiRahul

Excluding me, of course! Otherwise it might sound like a tongue-in-cheek question, since I asked...!

AE, and other silent ones! Perhaps you have the same question as well! Or better still, you might have the answer...!

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

Why exclude you, the author of the thread? And why at all?

Actually there should be  more than 1 angle to 'why earth is missing in astrology, I guess.:
First one is astrological; the other being philosophical maybe.

Rishi

Oh simply because I began the thread with a question that I seek answers from you all

& you seem to imply that *astrology* is separate from *philosophy*, but think for a moment, is it?

Much of what astrology as it stands is perspective based? Planets are never really retrograde, nor is there any real *combustion* (planets are too far from the sun to get burnt) and the houses have no meaning other than convention, some may say? Even physical reality is 3-dimensional (for the most part!), yet we use a perception of astro*logy* which is rather 2-dimensional? Think for a moment: the constellations appear in certain shapes in our 2-dimensional perception (due to distances involved from the stars), but even in a 3-D plane, they might actually have a very different shape and configuration!

So, pretty much all we call astrology is dripping with philosophy and perceptional in basis!

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

[RishiRahul]

Open to/for anyone.....

RishiRahul

Excluding me, of course! Otherwise it might sound like a tongue-in-cheek question, since I asked...!

AE, and other silent ones! Perhaps you have the same question as well! Or better still, you might have the answer...!

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

Why exclude you, the author of the thread? And why at all?

Actually there should be  more than 1 angle to 'why earth is missing in astrology, I guess.:
First one is astrological; the other being philosophical maybe.

Rishi

Oh simply because I began the thread with a question that I seek answers from you all

& you seem to imply that *astrology* is separate from *philosophy*, but think for a moment, is it?

Much of what astrology as it stands is perspective based? Planets are never really retrograde, nor is there any real *combustion* (planets are too far from the sun to get burnt) and the houses have no meaning other than convention, some may say? Even physical reality is 3-dimensional (for the most part!), yet we use a perception of astro*logy* which is rather 2-dimensional? Think for a moment: the constellations appear in certain shapes in our 2-dimensional perception (due to distances involved from the stars), but even in a 3-D plane, they might actually have a very different shape and configuration!

So, pretty much all we call astrology is dripping with philosophy and perceptional in basis!

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

Without the application of philosophy the application of astrology is far from complete.

Rather Philosophy cannot be separated from most crafts, if not all.
For an example: The philosophy of Jaimini adds Flavour to the Parashari.

Now, now, let me avoid controversies!
My older son had taken 'controversy theories' as the extra subject...Ha ha!

First I need to understand what is 'microcosmos' at first.
I think I understand it wrong.

Rishi

[Rohiniranjan]

Open to/for anyone.....

RishiRahul

Excluding me, of course! Otherwise it might sound like a tongue-in-cheek question, since I asked...!

AE, and other silent ones! Perhaps you have the same question as well! Or better still, you might have the answer...!

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

Why exclude you, the author of the thread? And why at all?

Actually there should be  more than 1 angle to 'why earth is missing in astrology, I guess.:
First one is astrological; the other being philosophical maybe.

Rishi

Oh simply because I began the thread with a question that I seek answers from you all

& you seem to imply that *astrology* is separate from *philosophy*, but think for a moment, is it?

Much of what astrology as it stands is perspective based? Planets are never really retrograde, nor is there any real *combustion* (planets are too far from the sun to get burnt) and the houses have no meaning other than convention, some may say? Even physical reality is 3-dimensional (for the most part!), yet we use a perception of astro*logy* which is rather 2-dimensional? Think for a moment: the constellations appear in certain shapes in our 2-dimensional perception (due to distances involved from the stars), but even in a 3-D plane, they might actually have a very different shape and configuration!

So, pretty much all we call astrology is dripping with philosophy and perceptional in basis!

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan

Without the application of philosophy the application of astrology is far from complete.

Rather Philosophy cannot be separated from most crafts, if not all.
For an example: The philosophy of Jaimini adds Flavour to the Parashari.

Now, now, let me avoid controversies!
My older son had taken 'controversy theories' as the extra subject...Ha ha!

First I need to understand what is 'microcosmos' at first.
I think I understand it wrong.

Rishi

Co-incidence theories is what might help more than controversy theories!
As Above So Below
Inner being a reflection of the outer?
Now the astrological question, since you seem to be besmitten by astrology
Lagna vs Arudha! Which is outer, what is inner...?

Love and Light,

Rohiniranjan