A hint (take it or leave it...?) ;-)

[Rohiniranjan]

A simple thing to watch for when ogling a chart...!

Planets are like sponges.

{Inhabitants} always colour the sponge...!

No aspect, or other sambandha (linkages) necessary...!

Love, Light, brevity?

[RishiRahul]

A simple thing to watch for when ogling a chart...!

Planets are like sponges.

{Inhabitants} always colour the sponge...!

No aspect, or other sambandha (linkages) necessary...!

Love, Light, brevity?

If planets are sponges, then who may be the inhabitants

Rishi

[Rohiniranjan]

A simple thing to watch for when ogling a chart...!

Planets are like sponges.

{Inhabitants} always colour the sponge...!

No aspect, or other sambandha (linkages) necessary...!

Love, Light, brevity?

If planets are sponges, then who may be the inhabitants

Rishi

Those resting in the natural home of sponges, or in technicalese, those that the sponges are dispositors of  :smt020

[RishiRahul]

A simple thing to watch for when ogling a chart...!

Planets are like sponges.

{Inhabitants} always colour the sponge...!

No aspect, or other sambandha (linkages) necessary...!

Love, Light, brevity?

If planets are sponges, then who may be the inhabitants

Rishi

Those resting in the natural home of sponges, or in technicalese, those that the sponges are dispositors of  :smt020

Now it makes perfect sense! and its true.
How a planet influences dispositors like a sponge?

Rishi

[Rohiniranjan]

A simple thing to watch for when ogling a chart...!

Planets are like sponges.

{Inhabitants} always colour the sponge...!

No aspect, or other sambandha (linkages) necessary...!

Love, Light, brevity?

If planets are sponges, then who may be the inhabitants

Rishi

Those resting in the natural home of sponges, or in technicalese, those that the sponges are dispositors of  :smt020

Now it makes perfect sense! and its true.
How a planet influences dispositors like a sponge?

Rishi

OOPS...! Re-read what you wrote :-(
That is upside down, Rishi or perhaps retrograde?
Dispositor *is* the sponge, not the other way round as written by you!

So beware of the rahu-dev in libra even though sponge is in pisces?

[Rohiniranjan]

You and I should collaborate and create modern cryptic retrograde-ese which will give a massive headache to readers! Way more than Katapayaadi!!

[Votive]

Pondering on multiple inhabitants and the consequent color of the sponge. Probably the Dashas and transits would impact he changing shades and hues.

[Rohiniranjan]

You mean lunar, solar and SOuLAR...? Progressions...??

[RishiRahul]

A simple thing to watch for when ogling a chart...!

Planets are like sponges.

{Inhabitants} always colour the sponge...!

No aspect, or other sambandha (linkages) necessary...!

Love, Light, brevity?

If planets are sponges, then who may be the inhabitants

Rishi

Those resting in the natural home of sponges, or in technicalese, those that the sponges are dispositors of  :smt020

Now it makes perfect sense! and its true.
How a planet influences dispositors like a sponge?

Rishi

OOPS...! Re-read what you wrote :-(
That is upside down, Rishi or perhaps retrograde?
Dispositor *is* the sponge, not the other way round as written by you!

So beware of the rahu-dev in libra even though sponge is in pisces?

Dada,

Can you explain this better and also about Rahu Dev in Libra one?

Rishi

[Rohiniranjan]

A simple thing to watch for when ogling a chart...!

Planets are like sponges.

{Inhabitants} always colour the sponge...!

No aspect, or other sambandha (linkages) necessary...!

Love, Light, brevity?

If planets are sponges, then who may be the inhabitants

Rishi

Those resting in the natural home of sponges, or in technicalese, those that the sponges are dispositors of  :smt020

Now it makes perfect sense! and its true.
How a planet influences dispositors like a sponge?

Rishi

OOPS...! Re-read what you wrote :-(
That is upside down, Rishi or perhaps retrograde?
Dispositor *is* the sponge, not the other way round as written by you!

So beware of the rahu-dev in libra even though sponge is in pisces?

Dada,

Can you explain this better and also about Rahu Dev in Libra one?

Rishi

You understood it correctly the first time, just described it in reverse. Treat the dispositor as the sponge and occupant as the color-source. So, mars is the sponge and rahu the colour in AJ's chart for instance.

Votive's suggestion would add the dimension of motion or rotation of the sponge! Assume that the sponge is not saturated with colour but its rotation in the dasa-chakra should make it put a faint vs a dark mark on the paper which is the nativity's perception and experience.

This is assuming that I understood him correctly. Maybe the three of us can join forces and create a new cryptic retrogrades...?

And we can buy and hoard all the headache remedies! Certain profit! <LOL>

[Votive]

The same sponge(s) obviously leave differejnt imprints at different times. The Sun which is rising is mellower than the one at Zenith and when at rest and not visible its mark is clearly not the same. This sponge colour should dynamically change as it courses through time.
But Stephen Hawking speaks of the "Arrow of Time", the 'pscyhological' one too, he is not too enamoured with symbolism as we are. Is the Arrow just straight and linear. We observe several sets of the arrows in icons of our perception.

D(E)igressing...Ranjanda, are you sure all we is one NOW or one Universe or maybe there are as many NOWS as there are what the scientists tentatively and apprehensively put as Multiverses.

votive

[Rohiniranjan]

The same sponge(s) obviously leave differejnt imprints at different times. The Sun which is rising is mellower than the one at Zenith and when at rest and not visible its mark is clearly not the same. This sponge colour should dynamically change as it courses through time.
But Stephen Hawking speaks of the "Arrow of Time", the 'pscyhological' one too, he is not too enamoured with symbolism as we are. Is the Arrow just straight and linear. We observe several sets of the arrows in icons of our perception.

D(E)igressing...Ranjanda, are you sure all we is one NOW or one Universe or maybe there are as many NOWS as there are what the scientists tentatively and apprehensively put as Multiverses.

votive

Synchronicity is an amazing thing, my dear friend. Since my 'awakening' (HAHA!) it has never failed to grip me by the scruff of my neck and for that I remain gratefully beholden, of course!

Only yesterday a good colleague-friend wrote to me, "...Briane Greene YouTube recently where he presents the string/M theory that Time doesn't travel in one direction from past to future & that the past, present & future all exist in the 'now' at the same time..."

And here you, another dear friend arrive and underscore the similar message about NOW being the holographic representation of ALL TIME!

When I had heard a similar concept some 20 years ago in the context of Seth discussions, it had stretched my comprehension. Over time, these complex possibilities sunk in somewhat and I do not fight them even if they involve angel-cards or Bhramari!

Now, is the sun changing its colour really? For that matter, is it even moving (relatively speaking! Not precessional movement!! )...? It is really an outcome of our perspective, is it not -- why the sun (apparently) changes its colour through the day? And the seer (we) remains relatively immobile while the earth moves?? It is interesting that in jyotish the earth has been replaced by sun in a place or two, and rightly so! But we are not going to digress into that, here, are we?

Re your appropriate and timely question about "we the universe" it is perhaps not so literally or rather physically, but isn't that what Macrocosmos=microcosmos=1 &nbsp; &nbsp;is all about? The very basis of astrology and perhaps divination in general...?

Do I hear, "Well played!" &nbsp;

[Votive]

The same sponge(s) obviously leave differejnt imprints at different times. The Sun which is rising is mellower than the one at Zenith and when at rest and not visible its mark is clearly not the same. This sponge colour should dynamically change as it courses through time.
But Stephen Hawking speaks of the "Arrow of Time", the 'pscyhological' one too, he is not too enamoured with symbolism as we are. Is the Arrow just straight and linear. We observe several sets of the arrows in icons of our perception.

D(E)igressing...Ranjanda, are you sure all we is one NOW or one Universe or maybe there are as many NOWS as there are what the scientists tentatively and apprehensively put as Multiverses.

votive

Synchronicity is an amazing thing, my dear friend. Since my 'awakening' (HAHA!) it has never failed to grip me by the scruff of my neck and for that I remain gratefully beholden, of course!

Only yesterday a good colleague-friend wrote to me, "...Briane Greene YouTube recently where he presents the string/M theory that Time doesn't travel in one direction from past to future & that the past, present & future all exist in the 'now' at the same time..."

And here you, another dear friend arrive and underscore the similar message about NOW being the holographic representation of ALL TIME!

When I had heard a similar concept some 20 years ago in the context of Seth discussions, it had stretched my comprehension. Over time, these complex possibilities sunk in somewhat and I do not fight them even if they involve angel-cards or Bhramari!

Now, is the sun changing its colour really? For that matter, is it even moving (relatively speaking! Not precessional movement!! )...? It is really an outcome of our perspective, is it not -- why the sun (apparently) changes its colour through the day? And the seer (we) remains relatively immobile while the earth moves?? It is interesting that in jyotish the earth has been replaced by sun in a place or two, and rightly so! But we are not going to digress into that, here, are we?

Re your appropriate and timely question about "we the universe" it is perhaps not so literally or rather physically, but isn't that what Macrocosmos=microcosmos=1    is all about? The very basis of astrology and perhaps divination in general...?

Do I hear, "Well played!"  

The resonance, some say, is always 'visible' if the strings are attuned !
Thank you for reminding me of Seth's take on time.

Call it Jyotish, call it divination, call it by any label as long as the echoes can be sensed Ranjanda.

The Sun, The Lagnesh, the Atmakaraka, the final dispositor(s) all beacons of clarity now and then.

Votive

[RishiRahul]

A simple thing to watch for when ogling a chart...!

Planets are like sponges.

{Inhabitants} always colour the sponge...!

No aspect, or other sambandha (linkages) necessary...!

Love, Light, brevity?

If planets are sponges, then who may be the inhabitants

Rishi

Those resting in the natural home of sponges, or in technicalese, those that the sponges are dispositors of  :smt020

Now it makes perfect sense! and its true.
How a planet influences dispositors like a sponge?

Rishi

OOPS...! Re-read what you wrote :-(
That is upside down, Rishi or perhaps retrograde?
Dispositor *is* the sponge, not the other way round as written by you!

So beware of the rahu-dev in libra even though sponge is in pisces?

Dada,

Can you explain this better and also about Rahu Dev in Libra one?

Rishi

You understood it correctly the first time, just described it in reverse. Treat the dispositor as the sponge and occupant as the color-source. So, mars is the sponge and rahu the colour in AJ's chart for instance.

Votive's suggestion would add the dimension of motion or rotation of the sponge! Assume that the sponge is not saturated with colour but its rotation in the dasa-chakra should make it put a faint vs a dark mark on the paper which is the nativity's perception and experience.

This is assuming that I understood him correctly. Maybe the three of us can join forces and create a new cryptic retrogrades...?

And we can buy and hoard all the headache remedies! Certain profit! <LOL>

I guess 2 ways of looking at the same thing..


Rohiniranjan===
Only yesterday a good colleague-friend wrote to me, "...Briane Greene YouTube recently where he presents the string/M theory that Time doesn't travel in one direction from past to future & that the past, present & future all exist in the 'now' at the same time..."


True, but in different dimensions.....my belief.
....Different ways of looking at the same thing, maybe

Rishi

[Rohiniranjan]

A simple thing to watch for when ogling a chart...!

Planets are like sponges.

{Inhabitants} always colour the sponge...!

No aspect, or other sambandha (linkages) necessary...!

Love, Light, brevity?

If planets are sponges, then who may be the inhabitants

Rishi

Those resting in the natural home of sponges, or in technicalese, those that the sponges are dispositors of  :smt020

Now it makes perfect sense! and its true.
How a planet influences dispositors like a sponge?

Rishi

OOPS...! Re-read what you wrote :-(
That is upside down, Rishi or perhaps retrograde?
Dispositor *is* the sponge, not the other way round as written by you!

So beware of the rahu-dev in libra even though sponge is in pisces?

Dada,

Can you explain this better and also about Rahu Dev in Libra one?

Rishi

You understood it correctly the first time, just described it in reverse. Treat the dispositor as the sponge and occupant as the color-source. So, mars is the sponge and rahu the colour in AJ's chart for instance.

Votive's suggestion would add the dimension of motion or rotation of the sponge! Assume that the sponge is not saturated with colour but its rotation in the dasa-chakra should make it put a faint vs a dark mark on the paper which is the nativity's perception and experience.

This is assuming that I understood him correctly. Maybe the three of us can join forces and create a new cryptic retrogrades...?

And we can buy and hoard all the headache remedies! Certain profit! <LOL>

I guess 2 ways of looking at the same thing..


Rohiniranjan===
Only yesterday a good colleague-friend wrote to me, "...Briane Greene YouTube recently where he presents the string/M theory that Time doesn't travel in one direction from past to future & that the past, present & future all exist in the 'now' at the same time..."


True, but in different dimensions.....my belief.
....Different ways of looking at the same thing, maybe

Rishi

Ah! Consistently cryptic as Kaal-purush Himself, eh Rishi? &nbsp;:smt017

What same thing? &nbsp;:smt017 &nbsp;:smt010