What is the role of hypnosis in the creation of false memories?

Learn and understand about Hypnosis. How it works, how to practice it etc.

Moderators: eye_of_tiger, shalimar123

Post Reply
User avatar
Dj I.C.U.
Posts: 2107
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:00 pm

What is the role of hypnosis in the creation of false memories?

Post by Dj I.C.U. » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:54 am

From http://www.fmsfonline.org/hypnosis.html#chbf

In 1985, the Council on Scientific Affairs of the American Medical Association published a statement warning that "recollections obtained during hypnosis can involve confabulations and pseudomemories and not only fail to be more accurate, but actually appear to be less reliable than nonhypnotic recall." The fact that hypnosis might be involved in the formation of false memories was well-known before the false-memory phenomenon became a problem.

Hypnosis does not operate in a vacuum.

Hypnosis has been conceptualized as "imaginative involvement" (J. Hilgard, 1970/79), "believed-in imaginings" (Sarbin & Coe, 1974), and "delusion" (Sutcliff, 1961). As such, the role of hypnosis in creating false memories is likely one of facilitating and even hastening a process whereby a suggested fantasy of the past comes to be accepted as a "true memory." In other sections of this paper we explain elements of the hypnosis process that may be involved in facilitating belief in a false memory: Hypnotic susceptibility, Role of imagination, How hypnosis affects memory, Hypnotic hypermnesia, Confusion about dissociation and Age regression.

To appreciate fully the role of hypnosis in the creation of false memories, it is important to remember that false memories of childhood sexual abuse can develop without recourse to hypnosis. Although hypnosis might re-awaken childhood fantasies, it is in the context of the beliefs and actions of the hypnotist, an authority figure, that the fantasy might come to be interpreted as historically accurate. We look at the context, the beliefs and processes, in which hypnosis may facilitate false memories.

User avatar
Dj I.C.U.
Posts: 2107
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:00 pm

Causal Connection

Post by Dj I.C.U. » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:55 am

Experience in the various countries where false memories of childhood sexual abuse have surfaced in relatively large numbers in recent years reveals a consistent pattern of memory creation. What happens, typically, is that a demoralized adult (Frank & Frank, 1991) comes to believe that s/he cannot negotiate life's current difficulties alone and seeks out a therapist. The person is unfortunate enough to choose a therapist who believes that all psychological distemper, from abulia (chronic procrastination) to zoophilia (sexual attraction to animals), is the product of repressed memories of sexual abuse during childhood.

User avatar
Dj I.C.U.
Posts: 2107
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:00 pm

Necessity of Memory Recovery

Post by Dj I.C.U. » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:55 am

In addition to clinging to the over-simplified belief that all dysfunctions are causally linked to repressed incest memories, such therapists also believe that "recovering" abuse memories will provide the person with insight into his/her difficulties, and that this will lead to a dissipation of symptoms. (While it is true that knowing why one behaves in a maladaptive manner can be beneficial, there is no evidence that such insight necessarily leads to symptom reduction.) A therapist highly committed to this assumption takes a patient's disavowal of abuse as evidence of being "in denial." This diagnosis may be made without taking a full case history; it places the novitiate patient in a subtle bind. There is something wrong with the patient if he or she remembers -- that is, the patient has been abused. But there is also something wrong if he or she does not remember -- that is, the patient is in denial. Unless the patient decides to terminate therapy, he or she is embarking upon a long and gruelling odyssey in search of repressed memories of past events that may not have happened.

User avatar
Dj I.C.U.
Posts: 2107
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:00 pm

Books or Experts Reinforce Belief

Post by Dj I.C.U. » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:56 am

n this type of therapy, sometimes referred to as Recovered Memory Therapy (RMT), the therapist typically provides the patient with bibliotherapy. Often s/he is referred to the book best known for its commitment to a belief in the ubiquity of repressed incest memories: The Courage to Heal: A Guide for Women Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse by Ellen Bass and Laura Davis. (Bass and Davis are open about the fact that they have no professional training and have a lesbian perspective. (Bass & Davis, 1988, p. 14, 76-77) ) The suggestive power of this book has been shown in the uncanny resemblance of many accusations to the book's script for "recovering" repressed memories

User avatar
Dj I.C.U.
Posts: 2107
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:00 pm

Mistaken Beliefs about Memory

Post by Dj I.C.U. » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:56 am

In some cases, the diagnosis of MPD/DID may be made based upon the belief that people with multiple personality were sexually abused during childhood even though as adults they do not remember. Given that "remembering" plays such a critical role, hypnosis may be recommended for recovering lost memories. The therapist and patient likely hold the mistaken beliefs that hypnosis is highly effective in restoring "true memory" and that there is no need for independent corroboration for the reports that emerge with hypnosis. Of course, the problem is that hypnotically enhanced recall, while confidently believed, may be highly confabulated.

User avatar
Dj I.C.U.
Posts: 2107
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:00 pm

Mistaken Belief that Repressed Memories are Different

Post by Dj I.C.U. » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:57 am

Another unsubstantiated belief is that repressed memories do not follow the general laws by which "everyday" memory is processed at the acquisition, retention and retrieval stages. It is suggested that at the acquisition stage the memory is encoded with photographic precision. It is further believed that at the retention stage the memory is encapsulated and is not subject to modification by such factors as post event information, or by self-serving reappraisals of the traumatic event(s). Finally, at the retrieval stage, it is assumed that the memory is not in any way modified by such factors as highly suggestive memory recovery techniques, such as leading questions ("Do you remember that your mother was too overwhelmed by the traumatic events to offer you assistance?"). The scientific research is clear that there is not the slightest scientific evidence for the existence of such an acquisition/retention/retrieval process. (see Kihlstrom, 1994; Loftus, 1979 for accounts of how memory is acquired, stored and retrieved).

User avatar
Dj I.C.U.
Posts: 2107
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:00 pm

Cult-like Behavior

Post by Dj I.C.U. » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:57 am

Following the diagnosis of repressed incest memories, with or without an MPD/DID diagnosis, a number of procedures may be employed that reinforce the belief that the diagnosis is correct. Clients are sometimes urged to stage an angry confrontation with the alleged abuser(s), not permitting him and/or her to refute the accusations. They may be advised to "get strong by suing" at the same time as being informed that "you are not responsible for proving that you were abused" (Bass & Davis, p. 137). (This may well be the worst legal advice of the millennium.) Further, they are usually advised to break off all relations with the family and with anybody else who questions the abuse narrative.

In effect, this places the patient in a cult-like environment, since by following these instructions the patient is almost certain to be surrounded exclusively by like-thinking others and will not be exposed to a demurring voice. This effect may be magnified if the person follows another piece of advice -- to become involved in an incest survivors' group. For people who have yet to "recover" a memory of sexual abuse during childhood, this can increase the pressure to conform to group mores and to "remember" something that justifies their presence in such company.

This process has been documented by Nelson and Simpson (1994) in a study of 20 retractors. Of 14 respondents who developed visualizations of childhood sexual abuse during the course of group therapy, all but one reported that similar or identical memories were shared by other group members. Typical comments were: "We had very similar alters (MPD alter personalities) and memories. One woman would feel left out because she didn't have a particular alter everyone else had, and she wanted it" and "If you don't have a memory you feel like you have to come up with one to compete with everyone" (p. 126).

Suggestive Techniques: Another suggestion that may be given to the patient who has no abuse memories is to question the belief that her childhood was a happy time. The client is admonished to grieve for the happy childhood that did not actually occur, even though she may think that it did. In some books, hatred is advocated as a healing method, and fantasies of murder and castration of the alleged abuser are encouraged -- contrary to all reputable clinical belief and practice.

User avatar
Dj I.C.U.
Posts: 2107
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:00 pm

Post by Dj I.C.U. » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:58 am

Writing exercises are frequently suggested to help recover memories. It is not unusual for a person to be urged to write non-stop, without regard for syntax and punctuation, on such topics as how the putative abuse occurred, and of factors in the father's childhood that may have predisposed him to the alleged pedophilia. In the accommodating environment of an approving therapist or a survivors' group, such a hastily written account of intimate details of a father's fantasized past may eventually become highly plausible and believable to the patient. Research by Elizabeth Loftus has demonstrated how the process of imagining an event inflates the likelihood of a person coming to believe it. (Loftus & Mazzoni, 1998)

After all of this, failure to "recover" the sought-after abuse memory is brushed aside with such assurances as: "If you are unable to remember any specific instances... but still have the feeling that something abusive happened to you, it probably did" (Bass & Davis, 1988, p. 21). And: "If you think you were abused and your life shows the symptoms, then you were" (ibid, p. 22). Further: "If you don't remember your abuse you are not alone. Many women don't have memories and some never get memories. This doesn't mean they weren't abused" (ibid, p. 81).

In brief, some of the possible influences that may lead to false memories include a treatment based upon the theory of repression, the use of such procedures as hypnosis, guided imagery, dream interpretation, and sodium amytal represented as "truth serum," and the therapist urging the patient to cut off all contact with an accused parent who denies being an abuser. In addition, treatments that focus upon regression to infantile experiences, the emergence of multiple personality, the recollection of past lives and the experience of alien abduction are all at high risk to produce spurious autobiographical memories. The risk is increased when these techniques are used in a culture that frequently depicts the recovered memory stories in movies, books and TV.

A demoralized person may be particularly vulnerable to a subtly woven script that sees all human distempers as a consequence of repressed memories of childhood sexual abuse. It is conceivable that a person may develop such a scripted abuse memory without recourse to a hypnotic procedure. But from what we know about hypnosis, it is highly probable that a person exposed to some hypnotic technique will more readily and more confidently come to believe in that for which there is no evidence.

saorsa
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: Denver, Colorado

Post by saorsa » Sat Dec 23, 2006 6:04 am

The findings of the AMA were correct only in as much as the findings they related to were conducted in a manor not related to regressive theraphy protocols. In otherwords, the same manor of findings could be found in the excution of unsuitable appendectomy. Mistakes are made, and will continue to be made by non qualified people. But, that's the AMA.............................

obewun
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:44 pm

Excellent summary Dj ICU!

Post by obewun » Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:09 pm

You have hit it on the head. Where did you gain such knowledge?

The unfortunate fact is that many people practising hypnosis overlay their patients perceived problem with their own belief system. This often, in highly suggestible clients, will produce a memory result that the clients unconscious has generated in order to please the authority figure. In this case it is the therapist!

How do you get around that issue? You can't unless you remain sufficiently aware of the therapists words during therapy and actively counter the suggestion. Not easy to do without experience. Make SURE that your therapist is properly trained and actually ask him/her if they only work with what the mind presents rather than trying to overlay suggestion.

User avatar
jigyasu
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:07 am

Post by jigyasu » Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:43 pm

Dj I.C.U. wrote:Writing exercises are frequently suggested to help recover memories. It is not unusual for a person to be urged to write non-stop, without regard for syntax and punctuation, on such topics as how the putative abuse occurred, and of factors in the father's childhood that may have predisposed him to the alleged pedophilia. In the accommodating environment of an approving therapist or a survivors' group, such a hastily written account of intimate details of a father's fantasized past may eventually become highly plausible and believable to the patient. Research by Elizabeth Loftus has demonstrated how the process of imagining an event inflates the likelihood of a person coming to believe it. (Loftus & Mazzoni, 1998)

After all of this, failure to "recover" the sought-after abuse memory is brushed aside with such assurances as: "If you are unable to remember any specific instances... but still have the feeling that something abusive happened to you, it probably did" (Bass & Davis, 1988, p. 21). And: "If you think you were abused and your life shows the symptoms, then you were" (ibid, p. 22). Further: "If you don't remember your abuse you are not alone. Many women don't have memories and some never get memories. This doesn't mean they weren't abused" (ibid, p. 81).

In brief, some of the possible influences that may lead to false memories include a treatment based upon the theory of repression, the use of such procedures as hypnosis, guided imagery, dream interpretation, and sodium amytal represented as "truth serum," and the therapist urging the patient to cut off all contact with an accused parent who denies being an abuser. In addition, treatments that focus upon regression to infantile experiences, the emergence of multiple personality, the recollection of past lives and the experience of alien abduction are all at high risk to produce spurious autobiographical memories. The risk is increased when these techniques are used in a culture that frequently depicts the recovered memory stories in movies, books and TV.

A demoralized person may be particularly vulnerable to a subtly woven script that sees all human distempers as a consequence of repressed memories of childhood sexual abuse. It is conceivable that a person may develop such a scripted abuse memory without recourse to a hypnotic procedure. But from what we know about hypnosis, it is highly probable that a person exposed to some hypnotic technique will more readily and more confidently come to believe in that for which there is no evidence.

you rock dude!!! thats exactly what "well read" b@stards are doing in the society around them.

obewun
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:44 pm

Dangerous therapists

Post by obewun » Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:06 am

Unfortunately many therapists taught in a particular "school" of thinking tend to overlay their learnings and their own personal issues over the issues of their clients. This is very dangerous and can lead to great harm.

I implore anyone who is treating clients presenting with problems perceived to be in memory to deal only with memories that have strong emotional content with methods that can diffuse the emotional content. There are many ways of doing this including NLP based techniques.

Please please please never overlay your clients memory with crap that you have read in a book or have been taught as the most likely cause of a problem. Work only with what presents...... and NEVER judge your client or the people in their lives. Your client is unique and always has a unique mind. Treat it with respect and you will win over the unconscious mind.

Gary J
abra-melin.com

Mer06854
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 2:30 am
Location: Norwalk, CT

Post by Mer06854 » Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:23 am

Imputting suggestions maybe, enough time so that it is believed that it actually took place.

Post Reply

Return to “Hypnosis”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests