astrological readings

[Madhavacharya]

From the beginning there are two schools of thought about authenticity of [color=darkred]astrological readings.One school is skeptical and other is staunch supporter.the main objection against astrology is that it has no scientific base and hence it
is not a science.against it astrologers advocate continuing studies of astrology based on statistical validation.there is no end to this controversy. people were, they are and the will take recourse to astrology in their difficult times.so it is the prime duty of the astrologers to guide them occuratly
ESSENCE OF ASTRO PREDICTIONS-----
to grasp exactly future happenings, to understand its magnitude and lastly to forecast correct timings of the events already predicted is the crux of these readings. when it is achieved it is immaterial whether astrology is science or not.
WHAT IS THE METHODOLOGY & TECHNIQUE TO ARRIVE AT CORRECT READING/S?