'Twilight' - rate it
Moderators: eye_of_tiger, shalimar123
'Twilight' - rate it
Have you seen twilight? give me reviews. tell me how you will rate the movie out of 10? keep in mind the fact that there's a huge section of girls that is simply crazy about this mystic movie.
Have fun, have faith in yourself and always have the best food!
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:21 am
- Location: New York
Dear Zetascair20086, thank you for your rating. have you read the books? then you would probably understand why viewers are so crazy abt this film. Stephenie Meyer understands girls. so do the directors of all these movies. do i need to say more?
Have fun, have faith in yourself and always have the best food!
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:21 am
- Location: New York
Re: 'Twilight' - rate it
been awhile sense i've seen it but i what i remember can not give it more then a 4-5. just felt like someone took the vampire story and made up some new stuff about vampires for the sole purpose of, well i don't know the reason. kind of waste of time. vampires that sparkle in the day light :smt018misty sur wrote:Have you seen twilight? give me reviews. tell me how you will rate the movie out of 10? keep in mind the fact that there's a huge section of girls that is simply crazy about this mystic movie.
as for New Moon i was just so bored to tears :smt010
what's really sad is that i really wanted to like the movies which is why i watched new moon. i love a good vampire movie then add werewolfs how can you go wrong well they did. :smt020
Common sense dictates there is no such thing as common sense.
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:21 am
- Location: New York
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:21 am
- Location: New York
I give them a 0.
For being bad. Painful, lacking in story, see through, predictable, and anti-feminist in the terrible Mary-Sueism of the characters, written as a blank canvas for self insertation, and brings no other message then having a hot, supernatural BF is important. Sure, I admit it's fine train literature, and leaves nothing behind, but the hype? I dont' understand it.
As one person said : It's about a young girl's choice between bestiality and necrophilia. :P
It's the same old, boring teen cliche given a new 'sparkly look' (pun intended) for better marketing.
As for 'understanding girl' - I as a girl who liked books found it annoying. It made me feel like it was continually dumbed down. That made me angry. - Using fancy words does not make a good writer.
As for the film.
- I gave up about 20 minutes in. I found it so bad it made Poltergeist II look like art.
For being bad. Painful, lacking in story, see through, predictable, and anti-feminist in the terrible Mary-Sueism of the characters, written as a blank canvas for self insertation, and brings no other message then having a hot, supernatural BF is important. Sure, I admit it's fine train literature, and leaves nothing behind, but the hype? I dont' understand it.
As one person said : It's about a young girl's choice between bestiality and necrophilia. :P
It's the same old, boring teen cliche given a new 'sparkly look' (pun intended) for better marketing.
As for 'understanding girl' - I as a girl who liked books found it annoying. It made me feel like it was continually dumbed down. That made me angry. - Using fancy words does not make a good writer.
As for the film.
- I gave up about 20 minutes in. I found it so bad it made Poltergeist II look like art.
__________________________
I-IV-V- vii - Why follow rules?
I-IV-V- vii - Why follow rules?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests